Subscribe : Posts | Comments | Email
If it’s too good to be true…

Dirk Becker

Author: Dirk Becker

Article:

While having a pint of their great beer at Longwood Station, a friend commented that he had seen one of my articles in this excellent magazine. He told me that he was seriously thinking about buying an IRP rather than using an RRSP to fund his retirement.

An "IRP”! Basically, an individual buys a life insurance policy that includes a savings account that grows tax-free. When you retire, you use the IRP as collateral at the bank and borrow enough to live on, knowing that the life insurance will repay the bank when you die. There is a risk that the bank may not offer you a loan. Also it is based on current tax laws which may change.

My friend told me that he thought it was too good to be true but had researched it on the web and was more convinced that it is a great idea. He was captivated by the idea of avoiding the tax on RRSP withdrawals.

I was intrigued and asked him how much he has in his RRSP – to which he answered "Not much”. Well, does he fit the profile of someone who really benefits from use of an IRP?

In fact, industry literature suggest that an IRP Strategy is excellent for additional retirement funds for individuals who:

– need life insurance

– are paying taxes in a high marginal tax rate

– have already maximized their RRSP and/or pension contributions

– are paying tax on non-sheltered investment income

– have an investment horizon of at least ten years with guaranteed income.

So let’s go back to my friend: he does not fit this profile and may need to look carefully at his strategy. If he invests $500 a month in an RRSP over 10 years, it will be worth $70,000 to $80,000. It will have cost $6,000 a year less the tax rebate – about $45,000. If he contributed $4,500 annually to an IRP then he would have life insurance if he died. However, the cash value will be lower than those in RRSP with the same interest rates, because of the cost of the life insurance.

Over time they both look like good savings plans, but what are the real differences?

What happens if he becomes disabled or critically ill in 5 years time and he cannot afford any further investment? His income will be EI for four months, then nothing.

If he chose the RRSP investment, he will have invested $22,500 and it will be worth over $30,000. He can cash some of this out as he needs it, pay taxes and hope to get better soon. If he chose the IRP route, he would get very little back if he cashed out.

But let’s assume his healthy and productive life allows him to pursue one or other strategy into retirement. The difference between an untaxed loan and cashing out a moderate RRSP at a low tax rate may not justify the risk.

So the IRP may work if he keeps it going, but he has little flexibility about contributions and he will have to be comfortable building debt after retirement – remember he does not fit the IRP profile and he will not have RRSP or other income.

If he were my client, I would ask him about his life, disability and critical illness insurance – first. These insurances give lump sums or income if we need them. I would ask him to plan for his needs, not simply to avoid future taxes.

Income security would leave the savings intact even if he could not afford to continue paying. If he can’t work, he would have enough to live on and leave his RRSP growing in an untaxed environment for his retirement, when he will be in a lower tax regime. If he became critically ill he would have a lump sum to help pay for additional costs, again leaving his RRSP intact.

Gill Campbell is a certified financial planner and an independent insurance broker.

Tags:

This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 6th, 2005 at 10:59 pm and is filed under FEATURE. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Synergy Magazine: Vancouver Island, BC, Canada